DUI Illinois, Summary Suspension, Lawyer, Driving on a Suspended or Revoked License, Chicago, Illinois DUI Attorney

The DUI criminal charge in Illinois is separate from the Statutory Summary Suspension, which is an administrative process. In Illinois, Driving under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI) or on a Suspended or Revoked license can have serious consequences.

An officer stops a vehicle at a roadside safety check or for probable cause, reasonable suspicion or unusual operation. The officer observes the driver and requests a driver's license, vehicle registration.

If the officer suspects the driver is under the influence, the driver is requested to submit to field sobriety tests.

If the officer has probable cause based on the field sobriety tests, the driver is placed under arrest for DUI and taken to the police station. The driver is requested to submit to a chemical testing of breath, urine or blood.

If a tested driver's BAC is more than .05 but less than .08 percent and no drugs are found in the system, no Statutory Summary Suspension will apply. However, the associated DUI charge will remain until appropriate action is taken by the court.

If the driver refuses or fails to complete testing, the Statutory Summary Suspension will apply. A repeat offender who refuses testing will not be eligible for a Restricted Driving Permit (RDP) during the three-year suspension. A repeat offender who takes the test and fails is not eligible for an RDP during the 12-month suspension.

If the driver's test results show a BAC of .08 percent or more, or any trace of a drug, illegal substance or intoxicating compound, the driver will be issued a law enforcement sworn report notifying the driver of a Statutory Summary Suspension.

If the driver's license is valid, a receipt is issued that will allow driving for 45 days. The offender is required to post bond and may be detained until bond is posted. The offender's vehicle may be towed, impounded or seized.

Statutory Summary Suspension, Illinois (Effective on January 1, 2009, a new Illinois law mandates car breath test device for first-offense DUIs. Provides that a first offender who receives a statutory summary suspension shall be issued a monitoring device driving permit (rather than a monitoring device driver's license), except under specified circumstances.)

A Statutory Summary Suspension is an administrative procedure providing for the automatic driver's license suspension of a driver arrested for DUI who fails chemical testing (a test showing a BAC of .08 percent or more or any amount of cannabis, controlled substance or intoxicating compound) or who refuses to submit to or fails to complete testing.

Penalty for failing chemical testing:

First offense — mandatory 3-month driver's license suspension
Second offense — mandatory 12-month suspension

Penalty for refusing to submit to chemical testing:

First offense — mandatory 6-month driver's license suspension
Second offense — mandatory 36-month suspension

A Statutory Summary Suspension in Illinois does not apply to an individual who has a BAC of less than .08. If a BAC greater than .05 and additional evidence such as an open container warrants a DUI arrest, the outcome of the court case will determine if penalties apply.

Summary suspensions in Illinois are automatic, effective on the 46th day from the notice date of the suspension. This suspension of driving privileges does not take the place of criminal penalties for a DUI conviction. An offender may request a judicial hearing to challenge the legality of an arrest; however, the request does not stop the suspension from taking effect.

If a commercial driver’s license (CDL) holder receives a Statutory Summary Suspension, his/her CDL privileges will be disqualified for 12 months if a first offender and lifetime disqualification for a second offender. A Judicial Driving Permit (JDP) may be available to qualifying offenders during the suspension period.

Penalties for a DUI Conviction, Driving Under the Influence, Illinois

A first-time or second-time DUI in Illinois is typically charged as a misdemeanor, not a felony. However, a third-time DUI in Illinois or a drunk driving case where someone suffers great bodily harm will be treated as a felony.

A first DUI offender in Illinois can receive court supervision, only once, which will not be viewed as a conviction. The criminal case is dismissed after successful completion of court supervision, but can't be expunged from the public record.

First conviction (under age 21) — Class A misdemeanor with possible 0- 12 months imprisonment; loss of driving privileges for minimum 2 years; 100 hours community service; fines of up to $2,500; eligible for Restricted Driving Permit (RDP) after one year of revocation; may be required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief.

Underage DUI, Illinois: zero tolerance law penalties apply to drivers in Illinois under age 21 who have any trace of alcohol in their systems or who refuse to submit to chemical testing.
• First offense: 3-month driver's license suspension for a BAC greater than .00; 6-month suspension for refusal to submit to or failure to complete testing.
• Second offense: 1-year driver's license suspension for a BAC greater than .00; 2-year suspension for refusal to submit to or failure to complete testing.
• If a commercial driver’s license (CDL) holder receives a zero tolerance suspension, his/her CDL privileges will be disqualifed for 12 months if a first offender and lifetime disqualification for a second offender.

Offenses Related to Underage Drinking, Illinois

Purchase or Attempted Purchase of Alcohol by a Minor
• Any person under age 21 convicted of violating the Liquor Control Act of 1934 for the illegal purchase, attempting to purchase, accepting, possession or consumption of alcohol will have his/her driving privileges suspended or revoked for 1 year.

Providing Alcohol to a Person Under 21
Class A misdemeanor with possible 0-12 months imprisonment; fines of $500-$2,500.

Parental Responsibility
Applies to parents or guardians knowingly allowing underage consumption of alcoholic beverages at gatherings at a residence. Class A misdemeanor with possible 0-12 months imprisonment; fines of $500-$2,500.

Illegal Transportation
Offenders may have their driving privileges suspended for 1 year for a first offense and revoked for a subsequent offense.

Hotel/Motel Responsibility
Applies to any hotel/motel employee who rents a room to a person under age 21 knowing that alcoholic beverages will be consumed there; or any person age 21 or older paying for a hotel room or facility knowing alcoholic beverages will be consumed there by individuals under age 21.
• Class A misdemeanor with 0-12 months imprisonment; fines of up to $2,500.
• Persons over age 21 paying for the hotel/motel room are held liable for any injuries or damage to persons or property caused by the underage drinker(s).

Accidents Causing Injury or Death
• Any person under age 18 who has been charged with an offense as a result of an accident in which a passenger was seriously injured or killed may be denied a driver's license or license renewal by the Secretary of State's office.

First conviction (over age 21) — Class A misdemeanor with possible 0-12 months imprisonment; loss of driving privileges for minimum 1 year; 100 hours community service; fines of up to $2,500; eligible for RDP; may be required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief.

Second conviction — Class A misdemeanor with possible 0-12 months imprisonment; fines of up to $2,500; eligible for RDP after one year of revocation; required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief; loss of driving privileges for minimum 5 years if committed within 20 years of first conviction.

—Within five years of first conviction: Mandatory 5 days in jail or 240 hours community service (terms of imprisonment or community service not subject to suspension/reduction nor is offender eligible for probation); fines of up to $2,500; eligible for RDP after one year of revocation; required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving.

Third conviction (Aggravated DUI) — Class 2 felony with possible 3-7 years imprisonment; mandatory minimum 10 days in jail or 480 hours community service; fines of up to $25,000; loss of driving privileges for minimum 10 years.

—Within five years of previous conviction: Mandatory minimum 10 days in jail or 480 hours community service (terms of imprisonment or community service not subject to suspension/reduction nor is offender eligible for probation); eligible for RDP after one year of revocation; required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief.

Fourth conviction (Aggravated DUI) — Class 2 felony with possible 3-7 years imprisonment; fines of up to $25,000; lifetime loss of driving privileges; not eligible for any type of driving relief.

Fifth conviction (Aggravated DUI) — Class 1 felony with possible 4-15 years imprisonment; fines of up to $25,000; lifetime revocation of driving privileges; not eligible for any type of driving relief.

Sixth or subsequent conviction (Aggravated DUI) — Class X felony with possible 6-30 years imprisonment; fines of up to $25,000; lifetime revocation of driving privileges; not eligible for any type of driving relief.

Driving Under the Extreme Influence — BAC of .16 or greater, Illinois

First conviction — Class A misdemeanor with possible 0-12 months imprisonment; loss of driving privileges for minimum 1 year (if under 21, minimum 2 years); 100 hours community service; fines of $500-$2,500; eligible for RDP; may be required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief.

Second conviction — Class A misdemeanor with possible 0-12 months imprisonment; loss of driving privileges for minimum 5 years if committed within 20 years of first conviction.

—Within five years of first conviction: Mandatory 7 days in jail; community service may be awarded in addition to, but not in lieu of jail time; fines between $1,250-$2,500; eligible for RDP after one year of revocation; required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief.

—Within 10 years of first conviction: Mandatory 2 days in jail; fines of $1,250-$2,500; eligible for RDP after one year of revocation; required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief.

Third conviction (Aggravated DUI) — Class 2 felony with possible 3-7 years imprisonment; mandatory 90 days imprisonment (not eligible for community service); fines of $2,500-$25,000; loss of driving privileges for minimum 10 years; eligible for RDP after one year of revocation; required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief.

—Within 20 years of previous conviction: Loss of driving privileges for minimum 10 years.

Fourth conviction (Aggravated DUI) — Class 2 felony with possible 3-7
years imprisonment (not eligible for probation or conditional discharge);
minimum fine of $2,500.

Driving Under the Influence — Child Endangerment
(driver over age 21 transporting a child under age 16)

First conviction — Mandatory 6 months in jail and 25 days of community service in a program benefiting children; loss of driving privileges for minimum 1 year; fines of $1,000-$2,500; eligible for RDP; may be required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief.

—If resulting in bodily harm to a child: Class 4 felony with possible 1- 3 years imprisonment; mandatory fine of $2,500-$25,000 and 25 days of community service in a program benefiting children (imprisonment or assignment to community service not subject to suspension); not eligible for probation.

Second conviction — Class A misdemeanor with possible 0-12 months imprisonment; mandatory 6 months in jail and 140 hours community service, 40 hours of which in program benefiting children (terms of imprisonment or community service not subject to suspension/reduction); not eligible for probation; fines of $1,000-$2,500; loss of driving privileges for minimum 5 years if committed within 20 years of first conviction; eligible
for RDP; required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief.

—Within 10 years of first conviction: Class 4 felony with possible 1-3 years imprisonment; mandatory 1 year in jail and 25 hours community service in program benefiting children (terms of imprisonment or community service not subject to suspension/reduction); not eligible for probation; minimum fine of $2,500; eligible for RDP; required to have a BAIID installed in vehicle as part of driving relief.

—Within 10 years of first conviction and resulting in bodily harm to a child: 18 months in jail; 25 days community service in program benefiting children (terms of imprisonment or community service not subject to suspension/reduction); not eligible for probation; mandatory minimum fine of $5,000-$25,000.

Third conviction (Aggravated DUI) — Class 2 felony with possible 3-7 years imprisonment; 25 days community service in program benefiting children (terms of imprisonment or community service not subject to suspension/ reduction); not eligible for probation; mandatory fine of $2,500-$25,000; loss of driving privileges for minimum 10 years.

—Within 20 years of previous conviction: Class 2 felony with possible 3-7 years imprisonment; mandatory 3 years in jail and 25 days community service in program benefiting children (imprisonment or assignment of community service not subject to suspension); not eligible for
reduced sentence; mandatory fine of $25,000.

Fourth conviction (Aggravated DUI) — Class 2 felony with possible 3-7 years imprisonment; not eligible for probation/conditional discharge; minimum fine of $25,000.

DUI while Suspended or Revoked for Previous DUI; Leaving the Scene of a Personal Injury or Fatal Crash; Reckless Homicide; or Aggravated DUI with a Death.

First conviction — Class 4 felony with possible 1-3 years imprisonment; loss of driving privileges for double the original suspension period or additional 1-year revocation.

—If suspended for previous DUI: Additional 30 consecutive days in jail, 40 days of 24-hour periodic imprisonment or 720 hours community service (terms of imprisonment or community service not subject to suspension/reduction); not eligible for probation; fines of up to $2,500; may result in seizure and forfeiture of vehicle.

Second conviction — Class 4 felony with possible 1-3 years imprisonment; mandatory 30 days in jail or 200 hours community service; loss of driving privileges for double the original suspension period or additional 1- year revocation.

—If suspended for previous DUI: Additional 30 consecutive days in jail, 40 days of 24-hour periodic imprisonment or 720 hours community service (terms of imprisonment or community service not subject to suspension/ reduction); not eligible for probation; fines of up to $2,500; may result in seizure and forfeiture of vehicle.

Third conviction — Mandatory minimum 10 days in jail or 480 hours community service; loss of driving privileges for double the original suspension period or additional 1-year revocation.

—If suspended for previous DUI: Additional 30 consecutive days in jail, 40 days of 24-hour periodic imprisonment or 720 hours community service (terms of imprisonment or community service not subject to suspension/ reduction); not eligible for probation; may result in seizure and forfeiture of vehicle.

Fourth conviction — Class 2 felony with possible 3-7 years imprisonment (not eligible for probation or conditional discharge); fines of up to $25,000; may result in seizure and forfeiture of vehicle.

Additional Consequences of DUI, Illinois
• A DUI conviction is a permanent part of an offender's driving record.
• The offender may lose work time.
• The offender will be required to complete an alcohol/drug evaluation and an alcohol/drug remedial education course or substance abuse treatment program before his/her driving privileges are reinstated.
• The offender must meet the requirements of the Secretary of State's Department of Administrative Hearings prior to obtaining a Restricted Driving Permit.
• The offender's vehicle may be impounded or seized.
• A Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device (BAIID) may be installed in the offender's vehicle as a condition of driving relief.
• The offender is required to carry high-risk auto insurance for 36 consecutive months.
• The offender's vehicle registration will be suspended or revoked.

Penalties for Other DUI-Related Offenses, Illinois

Aggravated DUI
A third or subsequent DUI conviction; a DUI while driving a school bus carrying children; a DUI resulting in great bodily harm, permanent disability or disfigurement; a DUI without a license or permit; a DUI with no proof of insurance; or a DUI after a prior conviction of reckless homicide or Aggravated DUI resulting in one or more details.

Aggravated DUI Involving a Death
A DUI resulting in one or more deaths.
• Class 2 felony with possible 3-14 years imprisonment; fines of up to $25,000.
• Possible 6-28 years imprisonment for multiple fatalities.
• Minimum 2-year revocation of driving privileges.

Reckless Homicide (DUI)
A DUI resulting in the loss of life.
• Class 2 felony with possible 3-14 years imprisonment; fines of up to $25,000.
• Possible 6-28 years imprisonment for multiple fatalities.
• Minimum 2-year revocation of driving privileges.

Possession of Drugs in a Vehicle
Illegal possession of a controlled substance or cannabis by a driver; violations must be entered in court records and reported to the Secretary of State.
• 1-year suspension of driving privileges for a first conviction.
• 5-year suspension of driving privileges for a second conviction within 5 years.

Knowingly Permitting a Driver Under the Influence to Operate a Vehicle
Class A misdemeanor with possible 0-12 months imprisonment and fines of up to $2,500.

Driving on a Suspended or Revoked License, Illinois

First conviction — Class A misdemeanor with possible 0-12 months imprisonment; mandatory 10-day imprisonment or 30 days community service; fines of up to $2,500; loss of driving privileges for double the original suspension period or additional 1-year revocation; may result in seizure or forfeiture of vehicle.

Second conviction — Class 4 felony with possible 1-3 years imprisonment; minimum 30 days in jail or 300 hours community service; fines of up to $25,000; loss of driving privileges for double the original suspension period or additional 1-year revocation; may result in seizure or forfeiture of vehicle.

Third conviction — Class 4 felony with possible 1-3 years imprisonment; minimum 30 days in jail or 300 hours community service; fines of up to $25,000; loss of driving privileges for double the original suspension period or additional 1-year revocation; may result in seizure or forfeiture of vehicle.

Fourth-ninth conviction — Class 4 felony with possible 1-3 years imprisonment; minimum 180 days in jail; fines of up to $25,000; loss of driving privileges for double the original suspension period or additional 1-year revocation; may result in seizure or forfeiture of vehicle.

10th-14th conviction — Class 3 felony with possible 2-5 years imprisonment; not eligible for probation or conditional discharge; fines of up to $25,000; loss of driving privileges for double the original suspension period or additional 1-year revocation; may result in seizure or forfeiture of vehicle.

15th or subsequent conviction — Class 2 felony with possible 3-7 years imprisonment; not eligible for probation or conditional discharge; fines of up to $25,000; loss of driving privileges for double the original suspension period or additional 1-year revocation; may result in seizure or forfeiture of vehicle.

Dram Shop
An employee or owner of an establishment may be held liable for a crash resulting from the unlawful selling, giving or delivery of alcohol in that establishment to a minor, intoxicated person or person known to be under legal disability or in need of mental treatment.
• Liability is limited to $50,467 for property damage or personal injury.
• Liability extends to $61,682 for a loss of means of support due to death or injury

Illegal Transportation/Open Container
Transporting, carrying, possessing or having any alcoholic beverages in the passenger compartment of a motor vehicle, except in the original container with the seal unbroken, is illegal. Exceptions to the law are limousines, motor homes, mini motor homes and chartered buses not hired for school purposes.
• Maximum $1,000 fine and point-assigned violation on driver's record.
• 1-year driver's license suspension or revocation for a second conviction within 12 months.
• Mandatory 1-year license suspension for an offender under age 21 for a first offense, and mandatory license revocation for a second offense.

Fraudulent IDs and Driver's Licenses
It is illegal to assist in obtaining or to fraudulently obtain, distribute, use or possess a fictitious or fraudulent state ID card or driver's license.The Secretary of State has the authority to suspend (up to 12 months) or revoke driving privileges prior to a conviction for anyone involved in the following offenses:

Class A misdemeanors (subsequent offenses are Class 4 felonies)
• Possessing, attempting to obtain or assisting another in obtaining a fictitious driver's license or permit.
• Allowing another person to use your license or permit.
• Displaying or representing as one's own any license or permit issued to someone else.
• Allowing any unlawful use of one's license or permit.

Class 4 felonies (subsequent offenses may be Class 3 felonies)
• Possessing, attempting to obtain or assisting another in obtaining a fraudulent license or permit.
• Issuing or assisting in the issuance of a fictitious driver's license.
• Manufacturing, possessing or providing any document for the purpose of obtaining a fictitious license.
• Possessing a driver's license-making or permit-making implement.

Judicial Hearings, Illinois

A driver may request a judicial hearing to challenge a summary suspension within 90 days after the notice date. The hearing must be conducted within 30 days of the request or on the first court date scheduled to consider the criminal charges.

Legally, only four issues may be considered:
• Whether the person was properly arrested;
• Whether there were reasonable grounds to believe at the time of arrest that the person was driving or in physical control of the vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or other drugs;
• Whether the driver, after being informed of the impending summary suspension, refused to submit to chemical testing; and
• Whether, after being advised of the summary suspension, the driver submitted to chemical testing that showed a BAC of .08 or greater or any trace of cannabis, a controlled substance and/or intoxicating compounds.

The summary suspension is rescinded if the court rules in favor of the driver. The result of the hearing is entered on the driver's record.

Driving Permits, Illinois

Drivers who have had their licenses suspended or revoked may be granted limited driving privileges. These temporary driving permits are only issued for employment, education and/or medical purposes when no other form of transportation is available. Some offenders may be required to have a Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device (BAIID) installed in their vehicles as a condition for the issuance of a permit.

Judicial Driving Permit (JDP), Illinois
• Drivers under age 18 are not eligible for a JDP.
• First-time DUI offenders may request a JDP from the court to allow limited driving during a Statutory Summary Suspension. (A first-time offender is a driver who has not received a previous summary suspension, been convicted of DUI or assigned court supervision for DUI in this state, or who has not been convicted of DUI in another state within five years.)

Before the court can approve a permit, the offender must prove a hardship exists and provide proof of a current professional alcohol and drug evaluation.
• The JDP does not become effective until the 31st day of suspension.
• A commercial driver’s license (CDL) holder does not qualify for a JDP to operate a commercial motor vehicle. The driver may be eligible for a JDP for base driving privileges if the driver is a first offender.

Restricted Driving Permit (RDP), Illinois

Full driving privileges are lost for a minimum of five years if a driver receives a second conviction for any of the following: DUI; leaving the scene of a personal injury or fatal crash; reckless homicide, or any combination of these offenses in a 20-year period. If a driver receives a third conviction for any of these offenses, regardless of the length of time between convictions, full driving privileges will be lost for a minimum 10 years. If a driver receives a fourth or subsequent conviction, his/her license will be revoked permanently. If a driver is convicted of DUI in another state, Illinois driving privileges will be revoked.

If eligible, those convicted of DUI may apply to the Secretary of State's office for an RDP.
• A multiple offender whose BAC test results are .08 percent or greater or whose chemical test indicates any amount of a controlled substance, is not eligible for an RDP during the summary suspension period.
• A multiple offender who refuses to submit to or fails to complete chemical testing is not eligible for an RDP during the summary suspension.
• A driver under age 16 whose driving privileges are revoked is not eligible for an RDP.
• To obtain an RDP, the offender must prove hardship exists, provide a current professional drug and alcohol evaluation and, when appropriate, provide proof of remedial education or treatment.
• An offender must appear before a hearing officer in the Secretary of State's Department of Administrative Hearings. The driving record is reviewed to ensure that the driver would not threaten public safety if allowed to drive on a limited basis.
• An individual with two or more alcohol related driving incidents on his/her driving record within 10 years is required to have a Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device (BAIID) installed in his or her vehicle for the duration of the RDP. As required by statute, the individual is responsible for the fee required for the BAIID during this period.
• An individual requesting a formal hearing for an RDP or reinstatement of his or her driving privileges will be charged a $50 nonrefundable filing fee when requesting the formal hearing.

Driver’s License Reinstatement, Illinois, Chicago

Statutory Summary Suspension, Illinois
Driving privileges may be reinstated at the end of the Statutory Summary Suspension period unless the court instructs the Secretary of State otherwise.

A person convicted of DUI who lost his/her driving privileges because of a summary suspension will have that time credited to the minimum driver's license revocation period.

Before driving privileges can be reinstated:
• Other suspensions or revocations on the driving record must be cleared.
• A $250 reinstatement fee must be paid to the Secretary of State, $30 of which goes to the Department of Human Services, Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse, to help defray the cost of professional alcohol and drug evaluations for indigent offenders.
• In the case of repeat offenders, the reinstatement fee is $500, with $60 going to the Illinois Road Fund, $190 going to the Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Fund, and $250 going to the General Revenue Fund.
• The reinstatement of a Statutory Summary Suspension becomes valid when it is entered on the driver's record in the Secretary of State's office provided the provisional termination date has passed.
• Payment for the reinstatement fee may be mailed to: Secretary of State, DUI Section, 2701 S. Dirksen Pkwy., Springfield, IL 62723. If paying by credit card, please call 217-782-3619 (debit cards not accepted).

Revocation

To have driving privileges reinstated in Illinois, a driver convicted of DUI must:
• Have a clear driving record other than the revocation sanction.
• Undergo an alcohol and drug evaluation. If an alcohol or drug problem is indicated, proof of treatment must be submitted.
• Complete an alcohol and drug remedial education program. Even if the evaluation does not recommend treatment, the driver is still required to complete a remedial education program.
• Appear before a Secretary of State hearing officer. For a first offense, aninformal hearing may be conducted by visiting a hearing officer at one of the regional Driver Services facilities. Multiple offenders must request in writing, pay a $50 non-refundable filing fee and attend a formal hearing in Chicago, Springfield, Mt. Vernon or Joliet.
• Demonstrate during the hearing that public safety will not be endangered if driving privileges are restored. The hearing officer considers the seriousness of the offense, the offender's overall driving record and the driver's remedial efforts.
• File proof of financial responsibility prior to reinstatement, pay a $500 reinstatement
fee, pass the driver's license examination (written, vision and driving portions) and pay the appropriate application fee.
• Repeat offenders must pay an additional $500 in reinstatement fees.
• Payment for a revocation may be mailed to: Secretary of State, Traffic Violations Section, 2701 S. Dirksen Pkwy., Springfield, IL 62723. If paying by credit card, please call 217-785-8619 (debit cards not accepted).
• An individual requesting a formal hearing for reinstatement of his/her driving privileges must pay a $50 non-refundable filing fee when requesting the formal hearing.

A reinstatement in Illinois becomes valid when it is entered on the driver's record in the Secretary of State's office.

Secretary of State
Administrative Hearings Dept.
291 Howlett Bldg.
Springfield, IL 62756
217-782-7065
or
17 N. State St., #1200
Chicago, IL 60602
312-793-3862

Citizenship, Acquisition and Derivation, Child Citizenship Act

Citizenship: Acquisition and Derivation.

(a) Introduction. (revision dated 07/18/2005) In addition to the naturalization process, the United States recognizes the U.S. citizenship of individuals gained through other means. A Certificate of Citizenship documents citizenship that is obtained other than through birth in the United States or naturalization under section 310 of the Act.

Form N-600 Application for Certificate of Citizenship is used to request the Certificate of Citizenship provided for in section 341 of the Act. Form N-643 was created after Congress provided for the naturalization of adopted children in 1986. The Child Citizenship Act of 2000 (CCA), P.L.106-395 , became effective on February 27, 2001 and led to revisions to the forms to apply for Certificates of Citizenship.

Application and petition forms, and documents issued to support an application or petition, such as Form I-130 Petition for Alien Relative, labor certifications, Form DS 2019, medical examinations, affidavits, formal consultations, letters of current employment and other statements, must be submitted in the original unless previously filed with USCIS. Official documents issued by the USCIS need not be submitted in the original unless required by USCIS. Unless otherwise required by the applicable regulation or form's instructions, a legible photocopy of any other supporting document may be submitted. (This paragraph added 07/18/2005.)

USCIS may, at any time, request submission of an original document for review. The request will state a deadline for submission of the original document. Failure to submit the requested original document by the deadline may result in denial or revocation of the underlying application or benefit. An original document submitted in response to such a request, when no longer required by USCIS, will be returned to the petitioner or applicant upon completion of the adjudication. If USCIS does not return an origi nal document within a reasonable time after completion of the adjudication, the petitioner or applicant may request return of the original document by submitting a properly completed and signed G-884 to the adjudicating USCIS office. (This paragraph added 07/18/2005.)

Please note that it is up to the applicant to establish eligibility for the Certificate of Citizenship. In general, issuance of the certificate provides evidence of U.S. Citizenship vested in the applicant. Denial of an application does not necessarily mean that the applicant is not a citizen. The evidence submitted in support of the application may not have been sufficient. Proper evidence may establish otherwise.

(b) Definition of Child for Naturalization and Citizenship . The definition of “child” for naturalization and citizenship is more restrictive than that used for immigration or adjustment of status. The definition for child as used in naturalization and citizenship (Title III) is found at section 101(c) of the Act. This definition does not include stepchildren. Adopted children are provided for when they are included specifically in any section of the INA that applies to citizenship. Before February 27, 2001, section 321of the Act governed citizenship for children born out of wedlock.

Legitimation is a concern when determining acquisition or derivation of citizenship. You must also be aware of the specific rules requiring the child’s legitimation under section 101(c) of the Act and determine the citizenship status of the father. If the natural father was a citizen at the time of the child’s birth, then section 309 and section 301 of the Act may apply, depending on the child’s date of birth.

Generally, the child must be legitimated while under 16 years of age, unless another section of the Act refers to a specific age. For example, under section 309 of the Act, the child needs to be legitimated by his or her father before age 18.

(c) “Acquisition” of U.S. Citizenship . Prior to the effective date of the CCA (February 27, 2001), “acquisition” referred to citizenship acquired at birth. The relevant statutory provisions dealing with acquisition are section 301 , section 303 , section 309 , and section 324 of the Act. You will find Naturalization Charts 1 and 2 (at Appendix 71-1 and Appendix 71-2 of this field manual) helpful in adjudicating acquisition claims.

Sections 301 and 309 of the Act provide for citizenship at birth.

Section 320 of the Act, as amended by the Child Citizenship Act, provides that the child “acquires” citizenship when certain conditions are met. Section 320 will be discussed under the “derivation” of citizenship, as it more closely resembles derivation statutes.

Section 324 of the Act provides for reacquisition of citizenship under certain conditions and was amended in 1994 to provide for the reacquisition of citizenship by certain section 301 citizens.

(1) Sections 301 and 309 of the Act . Form N-600 is used to apply for a certificate of citizenship when citizenship is acquired at birth under section 301 and section 309 of the Act. When adjudicating applications under these sections, the Act and conditions that exist at the time of birth of the applicant govern. Because these sections have been modified extensively over the past century, officers adjudicating these applications must be familiar with the Naturalization charts, with the issues that are covered in the Interpretations and changes in terminology through public laws. For example, P. L. 104-51 changed the term “illegitimate” to “out of wedlock” in section 101(b)(1)(D) of the Act.

• Children Born in Wedlock. The provisions of section 301 of the Act have governed the acquisition of citizenship at birth by children born in wedlock since 1952. Prior laws and statutes are extensively covered in the Interpretations. Most issues that have arisen pertain to cases where only one parent is a U.S. citizen and the other is an alien. Keep in mind the definition of child and that stepchildren are not eligible for citizenship through this process.
• Children Born Out of Wedlock. Prior to the Act of October 1, 1978, children born out of wedlock acquired citizenship through the mother if the mother had resided in the U.S. for one year. To acquire citizenship through his or her father, a child born out of wedlock needed to be legitimated or to meet other requirements depending upon when the child was born and when the child turned 16, 18 or 21. It should be noted that section 309 of the Act provides that section 301 of the Act applies to a child born out of wedlock when citizenship is claimed through the father. Therefore in adjudicating an application under section 309, it is not enough to establish that the father meets the requirements stated in section 309(a) or section 309(b) of the Act. Once it is established that the father and child qualify under section 309(a) or 309(b), the father must then establish that he had the required physical presence and residence under section 301(g) of the Act at the time of the child’s birth.


The general requirements for “Acquisition” are:


• Citizenship: The parent must be a citizen of the United States at the time of the child’s birth.
•Residence and Physical Presence: The Act has consistently required residence and physical presence in the United States or outlying possessions prior to the birth of the child. Officers should be aware that the definition of outlying possession has not been constant. For example, the Philippines were considered an outlying possession from 1899 to July 4, 1946. See section 101(a)(29) of the Act. Currently, the Act defines outlying possession as American Samoa and Swains Island.

Officers should also review section 301(g) of the Act for the conditions under which time spent outside the U.S. as a member of the military or working for certain U.S. government or international organizations may qualify as residence and physical presence in the U.S.

• Certificate: If approved an “AA” or “AB” certificate is issued. The date of citizenship is the birth date of the applicant.
• Retention Requirements: Until the Act of October 1, 1978 U.S. citizens who had acquired citizenship through birth outside the U.S. to one U.S. citizen parent had to meet residence and physical presence requirements in order to retain U.S. citizenship. Although the Act eliminated retention requirements for those born after 1952, it may be possible that a person born in 1952 and subject to the provisions of the 1940 Act would have failed to retain citizenship. For those born before 1952, consult Interpretation 301.1(b)(6) for a com plete discussion of the retention requirements.

(2) Section 324 of the Act: Resumption of Citizenship . The Act of October 24, 1994, Pub. L. 103-416, amended section 324 of the Act effective April 24, 1995 to provide that an alien who was formerly a citizen under section 301 or a preceding statute, but had failed to meet the retention requirements and had lost citizenship, could regain citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance. Section 324 does not change the period of time during which the person was considered an alien. Children born to such a person during the time they were not a citizen are considered to be born to an alien parent. Upon approval of an application under Section 324(d) the effective dat e will be the date of oath. The N-600 should be noted with the period of time that the applicant was not to be considered a citizen.

In preparing the Certificate of Citizenship (“AA” or “AB”) for such an applicant the following shall be noted on the Certificate:

• The effective date of citizenship is the date of oath. The date of citizenship must be marked with an asterisk.

• The reverse side of the certificate shall be endorsed in clear bold type : “(applicant’s name), a citizen of the United States by birth, from date of birth (DOB), to the present, excluding the periods of noncitizenship from to .”

(d) “Derivation” of U.S. Citizenship . Prior to the enactment of the CCA on February 27, 2001, “derivation” applied to citizenship that is obtained through an action after birth, such as naturalization of a parent. Derivation statutes are section 320 and section 321 of the Act in effect prior to Feb 27, 2001(see Appendix 71-6). You will find Naturalization Chart 3 (at Appendix 71-3) helpful in adjudicating derivation claims.

Because of changes in the Act, officers adjudicating these applications must have available to them prior sections 320, 321, and 322 of the Act. Applications for Certificates of Citizenship may deal with events that occurred prior to the current law, and officers must be aware of the prior standards for acquisition or derivation. The Interpretations will most often provide guidance on such issues as residence and physical presence. It should be noted that the Interpretations section 320 also covered prior s ection 321 and should be referred to when needed in cases involving derivation prior to the CCA.

(1) Child Citizenship Act, Pub. L. 106-395, Revised Section 320 of the Act . The Child Citizenship Act (CCA), effective February 27, 2001, amended section 320 of the Act and removed section 321. Although the CCA uses the term “acquires,” it is sufficiently similar to sections 320 and 321 in effect before February 27, 2001 to be considered a derivation statute. Officers adjudicating applications filed after February 27, 2001 should review the regulations at 8 CFR 320 which were published after the implementation of the CCA. The revised section 320 became the only method for children in the U.S. under the age of 18 to acquire citizenship. See also Appendix 71-7.

The CCA applies to adopted children and certain foreign-born natural children. A child adopted by a U.S. citizen parent is eligible for the CCA if the child satisfies the requirements applicable to adopted children under section 101(b) of the Act, including children described in section 101(b)(1)(E) and section 101(b)(1)(F) of the Act.

The CCA also applies to children who meet the requirements of section 101(c) of the Act. This includes unmarried children born in wedlock and legitimated children. An alien child who was born out of wedlock and has not been legitimated is eligible for derivative citizenship when the mother of such a child becomes a naturalized citizen under section 320 and 322 of the Act. Section 321 , in effect until February 26, 2001, had a specific reference to children born out of wedlock who were not legitimated.

A child of a naturalizing parent is also covered by the CCA provided that the child meets the definition of section 101(c) or section 101(b)(1)(E) or (F) of the Act. The CCA only requires one U.S. citizen parent to confer automatic citizenship. The naturalization of a single alien parent, regardless of his or her marital status or the immigration status of the other parent, is sufficient for a child to be eligible for citizenship under CCA.

The CCA applies to children residing in the U.S. pursuant to a lawful admission for permanent residence. Children who had previously been granted lawful permanent residence but were outside the U.S. temporarily on February 27, 2001 became citizens upon their return to the U.S.

For children who acquired citizenship on the date the CCA went into effect, the Certificate of Citizenship reflects February 27, 2001 as the date of acquisition. Children whose date of citizenship is February 27, 2001 are those who were still under age 18 and who met all the other requirements of section 320 of the Act (i.e., lawful permanent residence, living with and in the legal and physical custody of the U.S. citizen parent) on February 27, 2001.

After February 27, 2001, the date reflected on an individual’s certificate of citizenship will be the date when the last requirement needed to acquire citizenship automatically under section 320 of the Act is met. This date can be either:

• the date on which an alien parent of a qualifying child naturalizes, or
• the date on which a qualifying child is lawfully admitted for permanent residence, or
• if adopted, the date on which a qualifying child, who has been lawfully admitted as a permanent resident, has been finally adopted by a U.S. citizen or had such an adoption recognized by the state where the child resides.

Upon approval of the application the applicant is issued an “A” certificate.

(2) Derivation prior to the enactment of the CCA (before February 26, 2001) . Until the effective date of the CCA (February 27, 2001), derivation was dependent upon the naturalization of a parent. Prior to February 27, 2001, section 320 of the Act applied to a child who was born to a U.S. Citizen parent and an alien parent, while section 321 of the Act applied to a child born in wedlock to two alien parents and a child born out of wedlock to an alien mother (See old sections 320 and 321 in Appendix 71-6 of this field manual). Over the years, the citations concerning adopted childre n changed. Be sure to review the dates of adoption and the law in effect at the time. See Interpretations 320.1(d)(1), Interpretations 320.1(d)(1)(2) and Interpretations 320.1(d)(1)(3).

• Requirements: The basic requirements for both sections were the naturalization of an alien parent or parents, as applicable, the lawful admission for permanent residence of the alien child, and the satisfaction of these and any other statutory requirements before age 18. Since the order in which the requirements were satisfied was not stated in the statute, as long as the applicant meets the requirement of the statute before age 18 the applicant derives U.S. citizenship.

The exception was an adopted child during certain time periods. Therefore, for example, under the prior INA section 321(a)(3), citizenship would be derived when a divorce occurred after naturalization of one parent and the naturalized parent obtained legal custody of the child. The date of derivation would be the date of divorce.

• Legitimation and Legal Custody: Although the common application was based upon the naturalization of two alien parents, two important issues when adjudicating claims for derivation under section 321 of the Act are legitimation and legal custody. Section 321 allowed derivation when the two alien parents had a legal separation and the parent having legal custody naturalized. Interpretations 320.1(a)(6) contains a discussion of legal custody and legal separation which were valid for certain time periods. Officers should become familiar with the law of the states in their office’s jurisdiction with respect to legal custody. Generally, legal custody is custody granted by a competent governmental authority or by a statute. See also the current definition of legal custody in 8 CFR 320.1 and 8 CFR 322.1.

Provided all other statutory requirements are met, a child whose paternity has not been established by legitimation before the age of 16 may derive citizenship through the mother (see section 101(c) and section 321(a)(3) of the Act) . Remember that the age for legitimation has varied over the years from 16, 18 or 21 depending on the period and statute in effect.

Early volumes of the published decisions contain many decisions on legitimation and foreign legitimation. You may also consult the Foreign Affairs Manual or inquire with the Library of Congress if there are questions that still need to be resolved regarding the legitimation requirements of a particular country. Check the Library of Congress opinions on the Intranet before sending a request for an opinion. See Chapter 14.10 of this field manual regarding procedures for requesting Library of Congress research .

• Date of Citizenship: The date of citizenship for most applicants will be the date of the last action to occur before age 18. This will be one of the following:

– naturalization of parent(s).

– legal custody when there has been a legal separation.

–death of an alien parent when the other parent has naturalized

–naturalization of a surviving parent

– lawful admission for permanent residence.

For an adopted child, the date of citizenship will be the date of naturalization for the adopting parent if the other conditions are met.

(3) Other Persons Eligible for Certificates of Citizenship . The CCA amended section 322 of the Act to cover foreign-born children not eligible under section 320 of the Act who are residing outside the United States with a United States citizen parent.

Note: Until the Form N-600K, Application for Citizenship and Issuance of a Certificate under section 322, is available, a parent seeking naturalization for a foreign born child under this section may apply on the Form N-600; parents of an adopted child may also use Form N-643.

In order for a child born and residing outside the United States to acquire citizenship under section 322 of the Act, the United States citizen parent must apply for naturalization on behalf of the child. (See Appendix 71-7 of this field manual and 8 CFR 322.)

As of November 2, 2002, the 21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, P.L. 107-273, amended section 322 of the Act to allow the addition of U.S. citizen grandparents and U.S. citizen legal guardians as eligible to apply for naturalization on behalf of a child born and residing outside the United States. Under this amended provision, application by the U.S. citizen grandparent or U.S. citizen legal guardian can be made within 5 years of the death of a U.S. citizen parent of a child who could otherwise have been the beneficiary of an application pursuant to section 322. The law does not authorize applications pursuant to section 322 by any person other than a U.S. citizen parent except in cases in which a U.S. citizen parent has died. (See Appendix 71-8 of this field manual.)

The child will need to be in the United States temporarily to complete naturalization processing and take the oath of allegiance. The naturalization process for such a child cannot take place overseas. The application is filed with the U.S. office where the child and applicant wish to appear for the interview. The U.S. office reviews the application, and if it appears to be approvable, will send the applicant and the child an appointment notice. The appointment letter should be taken to a U.S. Consulate or the consular section of a U.S. Embassy in order to obtain a nonimmigrant visa for the child, if a visa is required for entry. The child may be admitted under any nonimmigrant classification. “Admission” is defined under section 101(a)(13) of the Act; “parole” is not considered an admission. (See also 9 FAM 41.31 Note 11.6).

You will need to determine if the child is maintaining lawful status. A child is considered to have maintained lawful status if his or her nonimmigrant classification has not expired or been revoked if he or she has not violated the terms of his or her visa.

If the child qualifies under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Act as having been adopted and has been in the legal custody and resides with the U.S. citizen parent for two years, documentation establishing the legal custody and residence must be submitted with the application. If the application is based upon a child as defined in section 101(b)(1)(F) of the Act, the application must be supported by an approved Form I-600 or evidence that the child has been admitted for lawful permanent residence with the immigr ant classification of IR-3 or IR-4.

Particular care should be taken to ensure that the U.S. citizen parent or U.S. citizen grandparent has the required residence and physical presence in the United States to transmit citizenship. Unlike in other sections of law, the U.S. citizen’s grandparent’s residence could have been before or after the birth of the child and application. Assuming the alien child meets all other requirements of section 322 , an alien child remains eligible after the death of the citizen parent's own citizen parent, so long as the citizen parent's own citizen parent met the physical presence requirement in section 322(a)(2)(B) at the time of death. (See LINK) to Policy Memorandum 94, dated April 17, 2003, "Effect of Grandparent's Death on Naturalization under INA Section 322.")

A child becomes a citizen under section 322 of the Act as of the date of the approval of the application and the takes the oath of allegiance, unless the oath is waived due to young age. The application must be approved and the oath taken before the child reaches his or her 18 th birthday. The child will receive an “A” certificate.

(e) Filing the Application and Initial Processing . Forms N-600 and N-643 are filed with the USCIS office in the United States having jurisdiction over the place of residence of the applicant. Overseas applicants may file the application with any office of the USCIS within the United States.

Upon receipt of the form, the application must be examined to assure that it is complete, presents a prima facie case of eligibility for the issuance of a certificate of citizenship and has the required fee and photographs. Applicants must submit any additional documentary evidence necessary to support their citizenship claim. Any document in a foreign language requires an English translation.

Further clerical operations will be necessary: obtaining or creating the applicant’s “A” file, verifying the naturalization of parent(s), verifying the military service of a parent, securing additional necessary documentation and other related files.

Former Form N–601, Status N-600 Application, was the processing worksheet for all N–600 cases. The N–601 has since been eliminated, but is exhibited in Appendix 71-9 to provide elements for a locally developed processing worksheet. Offices should use either Form N–601 or a locally developed processing sheet to record the status of the application. The processing sheet shall be maintained on the right side of the A-file.

You will need to determine if an interview is required. See 8 CFR 341.2(a)(1) to determine if the interview can be waived. All applications for certificates of citizenship filed under section 322 of the Act require an interview with the applicant and the child. See also Appendix 71-7 of this field manual.

• N-643 waiver of child's appearance: If the child is under 14 years of age on the date of the scheduled interview, and there are no circumstances in the case giving rise to the suspicion that the child is an impostor, or has abandoned residence in the United States, the child shall not be required to appear before an officer if the parent or guardian is available to appear for examination under oath or affirmation by an officer, as required by 8 CFR 341.2, and to identify a photograph of the child as that of his/her son or daughter. If the child’s appearance before the officer in connection with the N-643 application is waived, the oath requirement shall be regarded as also waived, and the words "oath and personal appearance waived" shall be noted in the report section provided on Form N-643.

• N-600 waiver of child’s appearance: When the person(s) through whom citizenship was acquired or derived is available to appear for examination under oath or affirmation by an officer, as required by 8 CFR 341.2 and to identify a photograph of the child as that of his son or daughter, the child's appearance before the officer in connection with the N-600 application, and the oath requirement in his case, shall be regarded as waived as long as there is no suspicion that the child is an impostor and no other s uch consideration.

(1) Initial Documentation . The documentary evidence in support of the N-600 application is not required if such evidence is available for use in other files. The instructions of the Form N-600 state that if the required documents are available, you should request the file to obtain them before asking the applicant to submit duplicate copies.

An unexpired United States passport issued for 5 or 10 years is now considered prima facie evidence of U.S. citizenship. Because it does not provide the actual basis upon which citizenship was acquired or derived, the submission of additional documentation may be required or the passport file may be requested. If after review there are differences or discrepancies between the USCIS information and the Passport Office records which would indicate that the application should not be approved, no action should be taken until the Passport Office has an opportunity to review and decide whether to revoke the passport.

If the applicant indicates that he or she did apply for some sort of documentation from the State Department, you may send a completed Form N-602 to the Director of the Washington District office. Clearly describe the document requested. Similarly, if documents requested are unusual in nature, they should be described in reasonable detail. Furthermore, if there appears to be a question concerning the legitimacy of the applicant, the validity of his parents’ marriage, or some other matter which may be expect ed to be resolved upon the basis of the documents requested, this fact should be appropriately stated in Form N-602. If there is some reason to believe that the applicant or parent has expatriated, briefly explain the facts on the form. You may attach supplementary sheets if there is not enough room on the Form N-602. Washington Investigations will verify the information or document requested with the Department of State. You should review the Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 9 Appendix C to determine the avai lability of documents from the applicant’s country of birth. The manual can be found on the Internet at:

http://foia.state.gov/FAMDIR/fam/fam.asp

A record of admission on Form I-94 may have been created during the period that retention requirements existed for some U.S. citizen children born abroad. These Forms I-94 are maintained in Headquarters Records for a United States citizen born abroad and entering the United States for the first time. Many are stored on microfiche and microfilm; in 1983, HQ Records started automating the I-94s. To request information about these files, you will need to send a fax to the Office of Records Management Certifica tion Unit at (202) 305-1737. You will need to include the name of the person or applicant, the date of birth, date of entry and the Form I- 94 number or admission number.

(2) Assumed name/Signature . When the applicant has assumed, or is known by a name other than a true name, but has not changed the name in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction where it was assumed, the certificate of citizenship shall be issued in the applicant's true name followed by the words "also known as" and the assumed name. However, in such a case the applicant shall be required to sign only the true name on the certificate and on the photographs submitted with the application. The certificate shall be signed by the ap plicant unless the applicant is a child unable to sign his/her name, in which case the certificate shall be signed by the parent or guardian, and the signature shall read "(insert name of child) by (insert name of parent or guardian, indicating which)."

(3) Assembling the Record of Proceeding . It is required that the officer properly identify and assemble the record material so that the record will be complete, that it may be read without taking the file apart, and that the papers in it are in the same order in every case handled. If an affidavit or sworn statement is taken, or a supplementary report is prepared by the officer to clear up a discrepancy or establishing that a discrepancy defeats the claimed citizenship, this affidavit, statement, or report should be attached to and remain a part of the file.

The order of the various papers shall be, to the extent possible, as follows:

(A) Form N-600 and supplementary sheets.
(B) Officer’s memo(s), if any.
(C) Affidavits or recorded statements taken by officer examining applicant or the person(s) acting in applicant’s behalf
(D) Documents from the applicant
(E) Other evidence, such as verification of naturalization, reports from Department of State

Form N-601 or the processing sheet shall be maintained as the uppermost piece of material on the right-hand side of the A-file.

(f) Adjudicating the Application .

(1) The Interview . Information gathered by the examiner during the review or examination may form a basis for revocation of the basic naturalization, or for criminal prosecution, or a basis of action upon similar applications in later years. You should review every answer in Form N-600, Form N-643, and Form N-600 Supplement A for completeness, accuracy, veracity and understanding by the applicant (or his parent or guardian if he is under 14). Each and every correction or change on the application or supplementary sheets, in cluding changes to improve legibility, shall be consecutively numbered, even though several changes may form a part of a single item within an answer. All changes and the numbers must be made in red ink.

The officer should quickly determine the identity of the person appearing for examination and his competency. The officer must be satisfied before administering the oath (or affirmation) that all persons understand the nature of the oath (or affirmation) and the significance of their testimony and of testifying under oath or affirmation.

The officer and all persons who are to be placed under oath or affirmation shall stand, if physically able, and have his right hand raised during the administration of the oath. The applicant, or his parent or guardian if he is under 14, shall be examined first.

Where it is necessary to develop and explain inconsistencies or discrepancies as a part of the record, every effort shall be made to obtain complete details in the form of a brief summary indicating what the applicant or witness said, rather than the officer’s conclusions, and if the matter is deemed important, a sworn (affirmed) statement shall be obtained. (See Chapter 15.6 of this field manual)

All documents shall be carefully examined and all persons interviewed with regard to all of the matters bearing on not only whether citizenship was derived or acquired as claimed but also whether the applicant is currently a citizen of the United States. In cases in which primary documentary evidence cannot be obtained, secondary evidence may be used.

The examination should cover such matters as identity and relationship; marital history; legitimacy or legitimation, where material; residence of the person(s) through whom claiming, both before and after naturalization; residence and physical presence before the applicant’s birth on the part of the person(s) through whom claiming; retention requirements; and expatriatory acts, including, where women are concerned, loss of citizenship by marriage to an alien.

Allegations as to naturalization may be supported by the Naturalization Certificate. If the certificate is unavailable or suspect, the allegations shall be checked against the relating file, other USCIS records, court records, or other verification of naturalization, and a determination made regarding whether the record of naturalization found relates to the applicant’s case.

Full details shall be set out for each link in the chain of citizenship for both the applicant and the person(s) through whom citizenship is claimed, and all elements essential to such citizenship shall be proved. Where a parent is a non-citizen national of the United States and that status is material to the applicant’s claim, this element shall also be fully developed.

Keep in mind the definitions of the terms “United States” and “outlying possessions” under the applicable section of law and clearly distinguish between “residence” and “physical presence” where necessary. (See section 101(a)(38), section 101(a)(29) and section 101(a)(33) of the Act).

All essential information furnished by the applicant or the person acting in his behalf which cannot be inserted in the application shall be made a part of the record by a separate detailed statement under oath or affirmation from the applicant or that person. If the nature and extent of military service in the Armed Forces of the United States are material to the claim of citizenship, Form N-426, or DD Form 214 issued to personnel at the time of discharge, shall be used to verify the information, unless th e verification relates to a person on active duty with the armed forces. In such event, a certification from the serviceman’s commanding officer, satisfactory in form and content, may be accepted.

(2) A Review of a Number of Important Data Elements on the Forms .

• PRC Number : Check the information on the Permanent Resident Card (PRC), if any, with the information in the appropriate box on the application and against the file number. This may reveal that a new file may have been created upon receipt of the application, even though an A-file previously existed. The examining officer must determine whether files should have been consolidated.
• Name : The applicant’s present full, true and correct name without abbreviation (and maiden name, if any) shall be shown. Any variation in name from that which is supported by the documents available shall be explained as part of the record.
•Birth data : The date and place of birth are especially important when derivation is through a parent, as they bear materially on identity of the applicant, legitimacy, requisite age to derive or retain citizenship, and relationship. They may also be material factors in considering whether particular conduct resulted in expatriation. The date of birth must be accurate and must be checked against all data in the file, such as the birth certificate, visa or other record of entry data, and alien registration record. Tran slations should be checked if possible with regard to dates, against the document translated, since translators may mark down an incorrect date in the translation. Where the date of birth is material, any variation in the record shall be fully explained as a part of the record and the examiner’s conclusion regarding which date is correct shall be supported by a memorandum containing his reasoning.
• Arrival data : Allegations regarding arrival shall be checked against arrival data in the file. If the applicant traveled on a United States passport and was admitted as a United States citizen, the passport number, together with the date and place of issuance, shall be shown.

If a lawful admission to the United State for permanent residence is material to the applicant’s citizenship, the officer must determine whether applicant’s entry constituted such an admission; whether the visa or record verified relates to the applicant; and whether entry on that date brings the applicant within the terms of the relevant statute. If retention requirements are applicable, the officer shall also determine whether they have been satisfied so far as timeliness of entry into the United States a nd residence or physical presence are concerned.

If the applicant claims United States citizenship at birth (“AA” or “AB” certificate), but was admitted to the United States as an alien, the facts shall be fully developed, particularly to ascertain whether expatriation has occurred. The explanation shall be included in a sworn (affirmed) statement made by the applicant, or, if time does not permit the taking of a statement, a memorandum shall be prepared by the examining officer setting forth the applicant’s explanation. Such sworn (affirmed) statement or memorandum shall be made a part of the record. If it appears the State Department has a relating file which should be consulted, a report indicating what the file shows should be obtained and included in the record.

When the applicant arrived before July 1, 1924, and lawful admission for permanent residence is material, the information set forth should be compared with data in official verifying records to determine that the record of arrival found relates. The verifying record should be carefully checked against data supplied by the applicant, since it may reveal discrepancies as to name, age, parentage, absences of parents or a prior application, possibly of another person, on which the same arrival record was used. Material discrepancies shall be explained in a memorandum made a part of the record, and where the discrepancies indicate possible fraud, a sworn (affirmed) statement should be taken and made a part of the record.
• Absences : The information in this item is essential to determining whether the applicant may have expatriated, or whether there was a failure to comply with applicable retention requirements. The date of an absence may be significant in itself if it occurred during a war period when service in the armed forces of the foreign state might reasonably be expected to have been performed with expatriative effect. It should be thoroughly explored with the applicant, parent to elicit all relevant facts bearing upon the iss ue. If you have determined expatriation occurred, develop a written summary of the facts.

After admitted absences have been recorded appropriately, the applicant shall be asked whether there were any other absences and, when the information in that respect is complete, the words “No other” shall be written in this space. The word “None” shall be written in the space for this item if there have been no absences.

• Required evidence of residence, physical presence : Documentary evidence of residence or physical presence required for acquisition or retention of citizenship must be submitted. Prior to 1978 records of admissions at ports of entry were often prepared by inspecting officers for United States children born abroad, upon the occasion of their first arrival in the United States. Such arrivals can be verified by consulting Headquarters records.

Public Law 95-432, effective October 10, 1978, repealed the retention requirements of former section 301(b) of the Act. The amending legislation was prospective only and did not restore citizenship to anyone who, prior to October 10, 1978, had lost citizenship by failure to retain it in accordance with former section 301(b) of the Act. The Act of October 10, 1978 also redesignated section 301(a)(1) to (7) as section 301(a) to (g).

Public Law 103-416, effective April 24, 1995, provided that aliens who had lost citizenship by failure to meet the retention requirements could regain their citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance. (See section 324 of the Act.) That provision, though, states that the effect is prospective only and during the period between loss and reacquisition the citizen was an alien. See discussion in section (c)(2) of this field manual chapter.


•Person through whom citizenship claimed : Only one block should be checked.
• Information about parents : The information called for is that relating to the natural or adoptive parents, as pertinent.
•Photographs and name shown on certificate : A person’s name may have been changed by a common law change, which permits the adoption of a name at will, provided it is not done for a fraudulent purpose. In many states, however, the right of common law change has been abrogated, or permitted only before a certain date. When it is found that a person may validly claim a name other than that given at birth, the space for name on the form shall be corrected to show such name other than the name at birth if not already shown. When it cannot be establishe d there has been a change of name by any legally valid method, the “also known as” procedure for including the assumed name in the citizenship certificate should be employed.
• Relating files : Relating files of other family members may be examined in cases where there is only secondary documentary proof, or where there is reason to suspect fraud, or where the relating file contains a document which should be made available to the applicant which bears upon the eligibility of the applicant.
• Prior application : If a prior application was denied, unless the denial was because of a ruling which has since been changed or abrogated, the evidence supporting the new application shall be carefully checked by the examining officer to determine whether it is sufficient to warrant a change in the previous determination. Any change shall be supported by documentary evidence.
•Signature : Be certain the application is properly signed by the applicant if he or she is 14 years of age or older; otherwise by his parent or guardian.
•Affidavit : The affidavit is found at the end of the application. Insert the proper word to designate the person executing the application. Draw a line through the words “and of attached supplementary pages numbered ( ) to ( ), inclusive” if there are no supplementary pages; otherwise, if any answers have been continued on supplementary sheets, number the pages and insert the numbers in the parenthesis.

Number any corrections and insert the numbers in the parenthesis. If there are no corrections draw a line through the words “and that corrections numbered ( ) to ( ) were made by me or at my request.” Make certain that the person executing the affidavit fully understands the allegations and corrections in the application and supplementary sheets before he signs the affidavit.

•Examination of Person(s) Through Whom Claiming and Other Witnesses . A witness shall be called to testify at the examiner’s option only if that person’s testimony is needed to prove a particular point, and only if alternative proof is unavailable or more difficult to produce than the witness.

When required by the examiner, the best witness is usually a close relative of the applicant, since generally such a relative, particularly an older one, is well qualified to testify to the relationship between the applicant and the person(s) through whom citizenship is claimed.

Unless there are material discrepancies, an issue of fact to be resolved, a question of expatriation, possibility of revocation of naturalization, or criminal prosecution, the written testimony of the person(s) through whom citizenship is claimed, or that of the witness(es) is not required. When material discrepancies or other circumstances require that the testimony be taken and recorded (written), a supplemental report clarifying the discrepancies, explaining the circumstances, or establishing that such d o in fact defeat the claim to citizenship shall accompany the application

(3) Supplementary Actions .


(A) Question-and-Answer Statements and Affidavits . When the evidence of applicant’s eligibility or ineligibility for a certificate of citizenship consists largely of testimony rather than of primary or secondary documentary evidence, it is necessary to record the testimony in a sworn (or affirmed) question-and-answer statement, or an affidavit, preferably the former. Such sworn (affirmed) statements shall be taken also where there is a complex or controversial question of fact, as for example, with regard to applicant’s age or identity. (See Chapter 15.6 of this field manual.)

(B) Blood Tests . The burden is upon the applicant to establish relationship to a United States citizen and ordinarily such proof is easily adduced in the form of primary documentary evidence. In many cases this solid documentary evidence is lacking, and although oral evidence may be received in such cases, it may be appropriate to require reinforcement of such evidence with less fallible proof in the form of blood tests. The officer should follow the policy as set forth in Chapter 21.2(d)(1) of this field manual.

(4) Making a Decision . The burden of proof is upon the applicant to establish his right to the certificate.

(A) Review of Evidence. All of the evidence of record must be reviewed to determine whether the applicant has satisfactorily established all the links in the claim to citizenship. Although this is an administrative proceeding not circumscribed by the rules of evidence applicable to judicial proceedings, it should be kept in mind that the record may subsequently be reviewed in judicial proceedings. The decision on the application, therefore, should be supported by evidence in the record of proceeding.

The evidence submitted by the applicant may be primary or secondary. Essential facts relating to birth, death, marriage, and divorce shall be established by official public records, if available. Only if the officer is satisfied that the applicant has made a reasonable but unsuccessful effort to procure such a record, or has official knowledge that it is unobtainable, may the officer accept as sufficient other secondary evidence that the applicant presents.

A document is most valuable when it is a record created contemporaneously with, or reasonably proximate to, the happening of the event recorded. A delayed or nunc pro tunc record created long after the event does not have the evidentiary value that attaches to a record created contemporaneously with the event. Such a delayed record must be shown to be based upon probative supporting evidence. Where the record contains little or no corroborative evidence, the applicant must produce further, more convincing e vidence. Inquiry should also be made not only into the manner in which the delayed record was created, but also into the reasons for the delay. The likelihood that the facts are as alleged should also be considered in relation to all information developed.

(B) Failure to Appear . The notice to appear for an examination shall be given not less than 2 weeks before the scheduled date of interview. If the applicant fails to appear for the examination, or to otherwise explain his/her absence, or does not request an alternative examination or does not respond to Form N-14 within the allotted time, the application shall be denied in accordance with 8 CFR 103.2(b)(13).

(C) Continuing a Case . Form N-14 may be used to request submission of documentary evidence or additional information from an applicant at any stage of the proceedings. The applicant shall be given a date by which to submit the documentation in accordance with 8 CFR 103.2(b)(8).

(D) Approval . Upon completion of the examination of the applicant (or of the person acting on behalf of an underage applicant) if one is conducted, the officer conducting the examination shall complete the affidavit of the application.

If the appearance of the child has been waived under the words “upon personal appearance” shall be stricken from the opening sentence in the “Report and Recommendation on Application.” No conditional or contingent recommendation is to be made therein. The recommendation shown is to be unqualifiedly either to grant or to deny the application.

The delivery of the certificate shall be withheld until the Form I-151/I-551 (PRC) is surrendered. Be sure to obtain PRC, reentry or other Service or USCIS-issued document. If it is alleged such documents were lost or destroyed, the applicant’s (or his parent’s or guardian’s) claim in this regard should be recorded on a lost PRC affidavit, Record of Sworn Statement (Missing PRC).

You must complete the stipulation regarding the manner in which citizenship has been acquired or derived. For example, if the applicant claims citizenship at birth, the item shall reflect the manner in which the person through whom citizenship is claimed acquired citizenship; whether such person was a United States citizen at the time of the applicant’s birth; whether such person resided or was physically present in the United States prior to the applicant’s birth and, where applicable, the period of such r esidence or physical presence. Appendix 71-5 of this field manual contains sample stipulations representative of cases in various categories. These stipulations do not exhaust the factual situation in which citizenship may be derived or acquired, but they are to be used verbatim when appropriate to the case and will serve as guides in drafting other stipulations to meet different factual situations.

(D) Denial . If the application is denied, notice of the denial and an opportunity to appeal therefrom shall be given to the applicant on Form I-292. If the applicant wishes to appeal the denial, he or she must file the appeal within 30 days of the date of the decision with the office that made the original decision. The notice of appeal must be filed on Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal to the Administrative Appeal Office (AAO). The appeal will be decided by the AAO.

Chicago Immigration Judge Reports — Asylum grants and denials, fiscal year 2000 through the early months of 2005

Chicago Immigration Judge Reports — Asylum Grants and Denials

The data and analyses is from The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), a data gathering, data research and data distribution organization associated with Syracuse University. Comprehensive, independent and nonpartisan information about U.S. federal immigration enforcement.
___________________________________

"Judge O. John Brahos was appointed as an Immigration Judge in October 1982. He received an undergraduate degree in 1956 from De Paul University, College of Commerce, and a Juris Doctorate from De Paul University, College of Law, in 1959. Prior to joining the Executive Office for Immigration Review, he served as general attorney, trial attorney, supervisory general attorney, and attorney examiner from 1971 to 1982 for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service in Chicago. Judge Brahos also served as an alternate member on the Board of Immigration Appeals in 1991, 1993, and 1994. He is a member of the Illinois Bar.

Judge Brahos decisions are available for the period covering fiscal year 2000 through the early months of 2005. During this period, Judge Brahos is recorded as deciding 649 asylum claims on their merits. Of these, he granted 172, gave 2 conditional grants, and denied 475. Converted to percentage terms, Brahos denied 73.2 percent and granted (including conditional grants) 26.8 percent.

For Judge Brahos , the largest group of asylum seekers appearing before him came from Guatemala . Individuals from this nation made up 9.6 % of his caseload. Other nationalities in descending order of frequency appearing before Judge Brahos were: China (8.8 %), Yugoslavia (7%), El Salvador (5.8%), Bulgaria (4.9%).

In the nation as a whole during this same period, major nationalities of asylum seekers, in descending order of frequency, were China (22.3%), Haiti (9.3%), Colombia (9.1%), Albania (4.0%), India (3.9%), Guatemala (3.4%), Indonesia (3.0%), El Salvador (2.4%), Armenia (2.1%), Mexico (1.9%), and Russia (1.9%)."
___________________________________________________

"Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan was appointed Immigration Judge in December 2000. He received his B.A. from Evangel College in 1975 and his J.D. from Franklin Pierce Law Center in 1978. Judge Der-Yeghiayan was selected in 1978 as a trial attorney for the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in Chicago under the Attorney General's Honor Program. In 1981, he was promoted to the position of district counsel for the Chicago District of the INS where he served until his appointment as an Immigration Judge in December 2000. He received the INS "District Counsel of the Year" award in 1998 and the Frank J. McGarr award for "Outstanding Government Attorney of the Year" in 1986 from the Chicago Chapter of the Federal Bar Association. He is a member of the Illinois Bar and the U.S. Supreme Court.

In 2000, Der-Yeghiayan was appointed, under the Clinton administration, an immigration judge in the Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review. On April 6, 2001, Der-Yeghiayan was sworn in as an Immigration Judge. President George W. Bush nominated him on March 5, 2003 for the district court seat vacated by Marvin E. Aspen, and the Senate unanimously confirmed him on July 14, 2003.

Detailed data on Judge Der-Yeghiayan decisions are available for the period covering fiscal year 2000 through the early months of 2003. During this period, Judge Der-Yeghiayan is recorded as deciding 258 asylum claims on their merits. Of these, he granted 80, gave 1 conditional grants, and denied 177. Converted to percentage terms, Der-Yeghiayan denied 68.6 percent and granted (including conditional grants) 31.4 percent." ____________________________________________________________

"Judge Jennie L.Giambastiani was appointed as an Immigration Judge in May 2002. She received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1983 from Loyola University of Chicago, and a Juris Doctorate from Loyola University School of Law in 1986. Prior to becoming an Immigration Judge, from April 1987 until May 2002, Judge Giambastiani served as district counsel, deputy district counsel, assistant district counsel, and supervisory legalization officer for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service in Chicago. Judge Giambastiani is a member of the Illinois Bar.

Detailed data on Judge Giambastiani decisions are available for the period covering fiscal year 2000 through the early months of 2005. During this period, Judge Giambastiani is recorded as deciding 274 asylum claims on their merits. Of these, she granted 101, gave 12 conditional grants, and denied 161. Converted to percentage terms, Giambastiani denied 58.8 percent and granted (including conditional grants) 41.2 percent.

For Judge Giambastiani , the largest group of asylum seekers appearing before her came from China . Individuals from this nation made up 16 % of her caseload. Other nationalities in descending order of frequency appearing before Judge Giambastiani were: Guatemala (10.2 %), Albania (8.7%), Iraq (4%), Ukraine (4%)."
____________________________________________

"Judge James R. Fujimoto was appointed as an Immigration Judge in June 1990. He received an undergraduate degree in 1976 from the University of Chicago, and a Juris Doctorate from DePaul University in 1979. Judge Fujimoto was a partner in the law firm of Alexander, Fennerty & Fujimoto in Chicago from 1981 to 1990. From 1978 to 1981, he served as a law clerk and then associate attorney for Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, also in Chicago. Judge Fujimoto is a member of the Illinois Bar.

Detailed data on Judge Fujimoto decisions are available for the period covering fiscal year 2000 through the early months of 2005. During this period, Judge Fujimoto is recorded as deciding 736 asylum claims on their merits. Of these, he granted 222, gave 9 conditional grants, and denied 505. Converted to percentage terms, Fujimoto denied 68.6 percent and granted (including conditional grants) 31.4 percent."
_______________________________________________________

"Judge Carlos Cuevas was appointed as an Immigration Judge in February 1994. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree from DePaul University in 1979, and a Juris Doctorate from DePaul University, College of Law, in 1982. From 1989 to 1994, Judge Cuevas served as an administrative law judge with the Illinois Human Rights Commission in Chicago. From 1986 to 1989, he was in private practice in Chicago. Judge Cuevas served as an attorney with the Legal Assistance Foundation of Chicago from 1982 to 1986. He is a member of the Illinois Bar. Detailed data on

Judge Cuevas decisions are available for the period covering fiscal year 2000 through the early months of 2005. During this period, Judge Cuevas is recorded as deciding 703 asylum claims on their merits. Of these, he granted 314, gave 20 conditional grants, and denied 369. Converted to percentage terms, Cuevas denied 52.5 percent and granted (including conditional grants) 47.5 percent.

For Judge Cuevas , the largest group of asylum seekers appearing before him came from Guatemala . Individuals from this nation made up 12.2 % of his caseload. Other nationalities in descending order of frequency appearing before Judge Cuevas were: China (7 %), Yugoslavia (5.6%), Albania (5.5%), El Salvador (4.6%)." __________________________________________________________

"Judge Craig M. Zerbe was appointed as an Immigration Judge in August 1985. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree. from La Salle College in 1970, and a Juris Doctorate from Temple University Law School in 1975. From 1980 to 1985, Judge Zerbe served as general attorney in the Litigation Division at the former Immigration and Naturalization Service in Chicago. From 1970 to 1972, he served in the U.S. Army. Judge Zerbe is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar.

Detailed data on Judge Zerbe decisions are available for the period covering fiscal year 2000 through the early months of 2005. During this period, Judge Zerbe is recorded as deciding 773 asylum claims on their merits. Of these, he granted 318, gave 9 conditional grants, and denied 446. Converted to percentage terms, Zerbe denied 57.7 percent and granted (including conditional grants) 42.3 percent.

For Judge Zerbe , the largest group of asylum seekers appearing before him came from China . Individuals from this nation made up 9 % of his caseload. Other nationalities in descending order of frequency appearing before Judge Zerbe were: Guatemala (8.8 %), Albania (7.5%), Bulgaria (4.9%), Pakistan (4.8%)." ___________________________________________________________

"Judge Robert D. Vinikoor was appointed as an Immigration Judge in January 1984. He received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Delaware in 1971, and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Baltimore in 1976. From 1982 to 1984, he was a special assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Chicago. He also served as trial attorney in Chicago, and general attorney in Miami, Florida, with the former Immigration and Naturalization Service from 1976 to 1982. Judge Vinikoor also serves as an adjunct professor at Loyola University School of Law. Judge Vinikoor is a member of the Maryland, New Jersey, Florida, and Illinois Bars.

Detailed data on Judge Vinikoor decisions are available for the period covering fiscal year 2000 through the early months of 2005. During this period, Judge Vinikoor is recorded as deciding 1015 asylum claims on their merits. Of these, he granted 239, gave 19 conditional grants, and denied 757. Converted to percentage terms, Vinikoor denied 74.6 percent and granted (including conditional grants) 25.4 percent.

For Judge Vinikoor, the largest group of asylum seekers appearing before him came from China . Individuals from this nation made up 11 % of his caseload. Other nationalities in descending order of frequency appearing before Judge Vinikoor were: Guatemala (9.7 %), Albania (5%), Somalia (4.1%), El Salvador (3.6%)."

New Illinois law mandates car breath test device for first-offense DUIs. Illinois DUI lawyer

Public Act 095-0400, SB0300, 95th General Assembly
This Act takes effect on January 1, 2009.

Download PDF
View html
Bill Status of SB0300

A new Illinois law requires first-time drunk driving offenders to install breath test devices in their vehicles and pass the test every time they try to start their engines.

If the driver's breath exceeds the alcohol limit, the apparatus ensures the car won't start.

Gov. Rod Blagojevich signed the legislation on August 24, 2007, making Illinois the fourth state to mandate the gadget.

The other states that require it are New Mexico, Arizona and Louisiana, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

When the law goes into effect in 2009, it will effect approximately 30,000 offenders in Illinois who have had their licenses suspended on DUI arrests, according to the secretary of state's office.

The alcohol ignition interlock devices must be rented and cost about $150 to install. There are also monthly fees.

"We will not tolerate drunk drivers on our streets," Blagojevich said in a statement. "This law ... will help make sure impaired drivers can't get back on the road. But if they do, they'll face tough penalties."

If offenders attempt to drive someone else's vehicle to avoid the breath tests, they could face jail time.

About 3,000 people in Illinois currently have the devices in their vehicles. Most are second-time drunk driving offenders.
__________________________________________

Deletes everything after the enacting clause. Reinserts the provisions of the engrossed bill, with various changes. In the State Finance Act, provides for creation of the Indigent BAIID Fund and the Monitoring Device Driving Permit Administration Fee Fund (rather than the Alcohol Monitoring Device Fund). Provides that a first offender who receives a statutory summary suspension shall be issued a monitoring device driving permit (rather than a monitoring device driver's license), except under specified circumstances. Provides that a person issued a monitoring device driving permit may not drive a commercial vehicle. Establishes other restrictions. Provides that a person who received a judicial driving permit before the effective date of the bill may continue to drive on that permit. Provides that a person who fails to comply with the requirements of a monitoring device driving permit commits the offense of driving on a revoked or suspended license. Provides that a person who holds a monitoring device driving permit convicted of the offense for driving a vehicle not equipped with an ignition interlock device, or a person eligible for a monitoring device driving permit convicted of driving with a drug or alcohol-related summary suspension, is guilty of a Class 4 felony and subject to 30 days of imprisonment. Amends the Unified Code of Corrections. Provides that a person who commits one of these offenses is not eligible for court supervision. 625 ILCS 5/1-144.5 new. Changes the effective date from January 1, 2008 to January 1, 2009.

House Amendment No. 2
Provides that, after a drug- or alcohol-related statutory summary suspension has been imposed on a first offender, the circuit court shall, unless the offender has opted in writing not to have a monitoring device driving permit issued (rather than if requested by the offender), order the Secretary of State to issue the offender a monitoring device driving permit.

Adjudicator's Field Manual, USCIS, Redacted Public Version- Updated Through June 18, 2007

Table of Contents

Appendices

Transmittal Memoranda

Immigrants and Other Permanent or Semi-Permanent Classifications.
Chapter 20	Immigrants in General.
20.1