<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="iBlog 1.4.1" -->
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title> <![CDATA[Immigration]]> </title>
    <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738</link>
    <description> <![CDATA[Immigration & Naturalization: Citizenship  and Immigration Services (CIS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Supreme Court, 7th Circuit, Board of Immigration  Appeals (BIA).]]> </description>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <webMaster>pbl@callyourlawyers.com</webMaster>
    <copyright>&#169; Perry & Baker, Attorneys & Counselors</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:27:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:27:56 -0600</pubDate>
    <generator>iBlog 1.4.1</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[DUI IS NOT A CRIME OF VIOLENCE: Leocal v. Ashcroft  543 U. S. ____
(2004) November 9, 2004.
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1537587039/E1869356296/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="ArialMT" size="4">A drunk driving accident is not a "crime
of violence" allowing the</font><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4"> government
to deport a permanent resident, the Supreme Court ruled
in</font><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4"><a
href="http://www.callyourlawyers.com/pdfcaselaw/leocal_duiviolence.pdf">Leocal
v. Ashcroft</a></font><font face="ArialMT" size="4" color="Blue">
</font><font face="ArialMT" size="4"><a
href="http://www.callyourlawyers.com/pdfcaselaw/leocal_duiviolence.pdf">
</a>  543 U. S. ____ (2004) November 9,
2004.</font><br /><br /><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4">The court ruled
unanimously in favor of Josue Leocal, a Florida
man</font><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4"> challenging his deportation to
Haiti in 2002 after pleading guilty to
a</font><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4"> felony charge of drunk
driving.</font><br /><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4">The 11th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals ruled that the DUI offense was
a</font><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4"> "crime of violence" under the
immigration statute because he had
caused</font><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4"> injury to
others.</font><br /><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4">The Supreme Court
disagreed. It said the plain meaning of the
statute</font><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4"> suggests that the felony
offense must require intent in causing harm
-</font><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4"> not mere negligence as in Leocal's
case - before immigrants are subject</font><br /><font face="ArialMT" size="4">
to the drastic consequence of deportation.</font><br /></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 18:47:45 -0600</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1537587039/E1869356296/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Criminal Penalties for Marriage Fraud -- 8 U.S.C. § 1325(c) and 18
U.S.C. § 1546
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1075917879/E1149098441/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="ArialMT">Marriage fraud has been prosecuted, inter alia,
under 8 U.S.C. § 1325 and 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a). The Immigration
Marriage Fraud Amendments Act of 1986 amended § 1325 by adding §
1325(c), which provides a penalty of five years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine
for any "individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of
evading any provision of the immigration laws." Under 8 U.S.C. § 1151(b),
"immediate relatives" of U.S. citizens, including spouses, who are otherwise
qualified for admission as immigrants, must be admitted as such, without regard
to other, ordinary numerical limitations. </font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 14:35:10 -0500</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1075917879/E1149098441/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Was the Marriage Entered into for Immigration Purposes? What is a Bona
fide immigration marriage
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1075917879/E2067159556/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">In order to be granted permanent residency, your
spouse's relationship</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">with you must be
established and your spouse must be admissible to
the</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">United States under the immigration law.
Also, the marriage must be bona</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">fide, not
merely a sham to get the non US citizen spouse a green
card.</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">The BCIS takes fraudulent marriage
seriously and you will be asked to</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">provide
supporting documents to show that the marriage is
valid.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Over the past two decades,
Congress and the BCIS have grown
increasingly</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">suspicious of marriages.  Since
1986, a foreign-born spouse who has
been</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">married to the petitioner for less than
two years is given conditional</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">permanent
residence for two years.  While this conditional status is
for</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">the most part the same as regular
permanent residence, it is designed
to</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">provide assurance that the parties did not
marry for immigration</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">purposes by allowing
the conditional status to be revoked if
the</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">marriage does not last two
years.</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:35:10 -0600</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1075917879/E2067159556/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[INS v. St. Cyr: Supreme Court Allows Criminal Aliens to Apply for
Waivers under former Section 212(c)
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1537587039/E1329442077/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">Courts have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 2241 to
decide the</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">legal issue raised by St. Cyrs
habeas petition. (2) Section 212(c)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">relief
remains available for aliens, like St. Cyr, whose
convictions</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">were obtained through plea
agreements and who, notwithstanding
those</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">convictions, would have been eligible
for 212(c) relief at the time of</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">their plea
under the law then in effect. Certiorari to the
United</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit No. 00767.  June 25, 2001</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:35:10 -0600</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1537587039/E1329442077/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Eligibility of Children Born out of Wedlock for Derivative Citizenship
(BCIS September 26, 2003)
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1075917879/E597620747/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">Assuming an alien child meets all other
requirements of Section 320 and</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">322, an alien
child who was born out of wedlock and has not
been</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">legitimated is eligible for derivative
citizenship when the mother of</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">such a child
becomes a naturalized citizen.</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:35:10 -0600</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1075917879/E597620747/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[DOMESTIC BATTERY CONVICTION (ILLINOIS) AND REMOVAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C462365879/E1706212424/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">Domestic violence and related convictions will
cause immigration</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">problems not only for
individuals  that have a pending application
for</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">permanent resident status (green card)
with  the local CIS office but</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">also for
individuals that are already permanent residents or those
who</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">seek to apply for United States
citizenship through naturalization.</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:35:10 -0600</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C462365879/E1706212424/index.html</guid>
	  <enclosure url="http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C462365879/E1706212424/Media/Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young - Immigration Man.mp3" length="2890968" type="audio/mpeg" />

    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Misdemeanor Domestic Battery not a Crime of Violence, Flores v.
Ashcroft, Seventh Circuit, November 2003
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C462365879/E103889731/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">In Flores v. Ashcroft the Seventh Circuit held
that a respondent</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">convicted under the Indiana
Battery statute was not deportable for
a</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">crime involving domestic violence because
there was not a substantial</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">risk that the
offense involved the use of force.  November 26,
2003,</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">2003 U.S. App. LEXIS
24051</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica"><a
href="http://callyourlawyers.com/pdfcaselaw/flores_v_ashcroft_7th.pdf">Download
PDF case</a> </font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:35:10 -0600</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C462365879/E103889731/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Sunset of Additional $1,000 Filing Fee, Return to 65,000 Annual Limit on
H-1B Petition Approvals (September 15, 2003)
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1243447823/E272271389/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">September 15, 2003 MEMORANDUM from William R.
Yates /s/ Associate Director for Operations Bureau of Citizenship and
Immigration Services </font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:35:10 -0500</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1243447823/E272271389/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[LIST OF DESIGNATED CIVIL SURGEONS, Form I-693 medical examination,
Citizenship &amp; Immigration Services (CIS) CHICAGO
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1075917879/E1062623860/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="TimesNewRomanPSMT">Most applicants for adjustment of status
are required to have a
medical</font><br /><font face="TimesNewRomanPSMT">examination. The medical
examination must be conducted by a
civil</font><br /><font face="TimesNewRomanPSMT">surgeon who has been designated
by Citizenship and Immigration Services. </font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 10:35:10 -0500</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1075917879/E1062623860/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Continuing Validity of Form I-140 Petition when the alien beneficiary
claims eligibility benefits under §106(c) of AC21 due to a change in his or
her employment.
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1202855932/E64921492/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">08/04/03 Memo from William R. Yates /s/ Janis
Sposato HQBCIS</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 09:35:10 -0500</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1202855932/E64921492/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) Precedent Decisions
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C481518184/E68320610/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">January 2002 to July 2003
Summaries</font><br /><font face="ArialMT"> </font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:35:10 -0500</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C481518184/E68320610/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Conviction under Immigration law includes Illinois sentence for "1410
probation" ( July 8, 2003)
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C462365879/E675228654/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">Gill v. Ashcroft, (7th Cir.) 2003 WL 21525603.
July 8, 2003</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Ct. of Appeal lacked
jurisdiction to consider appeal of instant
removal</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">order under 8 USC
§1227(a)(2)(B)(i) based on existence of alien's
prior</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Illinois state court conviction for
possession of cocaine that was</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">ultimately
dismissed upon alien's successful completion of
probation</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">period; under 8 USC
§1101(a)(48)(A), alien's state court
proceeding</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">qualified as "conviction" that
precluded alien from applying
for</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">discretionary relief from removal
order.</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2003 17:35:10 -0500</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C462365879/E675228654/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Demore v. Kim:  Mandatory Detention Allowed | Custody &amp; No
Bond/Bail: INA Sec. 236(c)(1), 8 U.S.C.S. Sec. 1226(c)(1) (April 29, 2003)
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1537587039/E184779943/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">The US Supreme Court declared that lawful
permanent residents with</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">certain criminal
convictions can be detained pursuant to INA §236(c) 
</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">without an individual bond hearing. The
Court, however, also held that §</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">236(e)
does not preclude habeas review of challenges to detention
under</font><br /><font face="Helvetica"><a
href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1226.html">§ 236(c)</a>
. </font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">The Supreme Court decision in Demore
v. Kim applied only to        </font><br /><font face="Helvetica">individuals
who conceded deportability and explicitly did not
address</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">the adequacy of the <a
href="http://callyourlawyers.com/pdfcaselaw/matterofjoseph.pdf">Matter of
Joseph  hearing</a>,  which allows a person
to</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">be released if she or he can demonstrate
that the government is</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">"substantially
unlikely to prevail" on the charges of removal. To
the</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">extent possible, non-citizens should not
concede deportability and</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">request a Matter of
Joseph hearing. <a
href="http://callyourlawyers.com/pdfcaselaw/matterofjoseph.pdf">22 I. &amp;
N. Dec. 799 (BIA 1999) 
</font><br /><font face="Helvetica"></a>http://callyourlawyers.com/pdfcaselaw/matterofjoseph.pdf</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">The
Immigration Judge may make a determination on whether a
lawful</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">permanent resident “is not
properly included” in a mandatory
detention</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">category, in accordance with 8
C.F.R. § 3.19(h)(2)(ii), either before 
</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">or after the conclusion of the underlying
removal case. If this</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">threshold bond decision
is made after the Immigration Judge’s
resolution</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">of the removal case, the
Immigration Judge may rely on that
underlying</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">merits determination.</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:35:10 -0500</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1537587039/E184779943/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS INTERVIEW: DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS (I-485) Chicago
CIS
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1075917879/E1676067069/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">CIS Notice of Appointment of Interview for
Adjustment of Status to that of a Permanent Resident, Chicago,
Illinois</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:35:10 -0600</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1075917879/E1676067069/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Revised Cable on Child Status Protection Act, Department of State ALDAC
#2 (01/03/03)
]]></title>
      <link>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1282672291/E678252711/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">State Department cable clarifies the main points
of the Child Status Protection Act of 2000 ("CSPA"), Sample Worksheet for
Calculating Age in Section 3 Cases, January 2003</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:35:10 -0600</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://www.callyourlawyers.com/iblog/index.html/B1833440738/C1282672291/E678252711/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>
